Skip to main content

Huzzah! "Happy Birthday" is finally in the public domain!

GoodMorningToAll 1893 song
The original version of the song, which actually had different words.
 In a different publication of the song, the lyrics to "Happy Birthday" were included as optional.

  One thing that's always irked me about having a birthday and being at a restaurant is how they never sing you the real version of happy birthday! It's always some cheesy sounding jazzy song, and while they're singing it, you and everyone else sits there, wishing they were singing the real version so you could sing along.

  It seemed pointless, but I never knew the real reason behind it until about a year ago. It's simple- the lyrics to Happy Birthday, until June 28th, 2016, were under copyright.

  Most people didn't even know this, that the song everyone sings at birthdays, a nationwide symbol of cakes, candles, and making wishes, was copyrighted. But it was. And so, restaurants couldn't sing it, because, while it was acceptable for small groups of family and friends to do so, anything else was a violation of said company's copyright and therefore said company could fine them, and charge royalties. Basically, it cost anyone else money anytime they wanted to preform Happy Birthday.

  But recently not too long ago, a suit was finished up between the holder of the copyright (Warner/Chappell, a music publishing company) and Jennifer Nelson (A documentary filmmaker who wanted to make a film about the song). Apccording to Wikipedia, the Summy Co. (The original publisher), never correctly copyrighted the song, and though copyrights were made on a specific piano arrangement in 1935, they did not include the original lyrics and music. However, Summy Co. assumed they did, and in 1988, when Summy Co. (Now Birch Tree Group Ltd.) was purchased by Warner/Chappell Music, the supposed rights to the music went with it. By 2008, Warner/Chappell was collecting $5000 a day in royalties from the song, and was making $2 million a year. In June of 2013, Jennifer Nelson filed a lawsuit against them, after having payed $1500 to secure the rights for her documentary film about the song. Based off some research done by law professor Robert Brauneis, her side presented evidence that the copyright claims made by Warner/Chappell were invalid. The Judge ruled that they did not have rights to the music or lyrics, but nobody else did. By default, it would fall into the public domain. But it was in a grey area, where nobody could really do anything with it and be sure it was legal. A little later, Warner/Chappell agreed to pay $14 million to previous licensees of the song, dating back to 1949.

  Finally, on June 28th, 2016, a final hearing was held to decide if the song was in the public domain. It was decided that the song, both lyrics and music, are indeed in the public domain. Hurrah!

  You can find Jennifer Nelson's documentary about the lawsuit and the story behind it here.


Popular posts from this blog

I got a car!

This is a Dooling "F" tether car. They were produced by the Dooling Bros company, in around 1946. What are tether cars? Good question! They're model race cars with tiny real engines, that are raced around a circular track, reaching speeds of up to 200mph. It was most popular back in the 1920's to 1950's, and there are still enthusiasts out there today.

The pressed-aluminum front grill. I think this actually serves a purpose, as the engine has to be cooled somehow...
  Last Saturday, my dad and I went up to Astoria to look at a Volkswagen Rabbit that was for sale there. (We did end up buying it.) On the way back, my dad decided to go look at a sailboat he'd seen on Craigslist. It was part of an estate, and since the guy who was there had been working in a barn full of stuff, I asked if I could poke around. I spied this in a box and was intrigued.

 Upon digging it out, I found that it was powered by a tiny little single cylinder engine. Anyways, the guy who …

Some Creative Commons pictures I took

A hen and chicks plant that is growing in a pot at my house.
A minor hobby of mine is photography. I don't know a whole lot about it, nor do I have any fancy equipment (unfortunately), but I can get my smartphone (A florescent yellow-green Sony Xperia Z1 Compact) to take decent photos. I usually take pictures of flowers, and occasionally I get a decent photo of something else.

  Anyways, I want to share some of my favorites here, under a Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution license. What does that mean? Here's a quick overview from the Creative Commons website.

You are free to: 
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.  No…

SAA1099 & Arduino - Fireflies - Owl City

I just finished a YouTube video that's been stewing in the back of my mind for quite a while.
It's an Arduino Uno hooked up to a vintage SAA1099 square wave generator chip, playing "Fireflies", by Owl City.

When I first conceived the idea, I wanted to make a bunch of cuts in the video to different angles. However, with the equipment I had at that time, it would have been several days of work, at least. Recently, I bought/made a few tools that made the production of this video much easier than I'd thought it would be. I'm quite pleased with the results.

My crazy "Studio" setup
  What was the equipment? An vintage high quality thrift store tripod (5$), an homemade audio input adapter for my phone (Free), and the craziest lighting setup I've attempted (Also free), and I got some pretty nice video and flawless audio!

  I'm looking forward to making more cool videos in the near future, and maybe eventually I'll even buy something better tha…
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.